|
|
Post by alex0816 on Apr 12, 2010 23:29:42 GMT
I am quite enjoying actually(saying a lot since i could barely watch the last couple weeks of impact, and this is comming from a huge tna fan)I like the way they are bringing some realism to the storylines.
so what do you guys think?
|
|
|
|
Post by DM on Apr 14, 2010 0:06:57 GMT
realism, maybe but TNA is still not my brand and I doubt it ever will be. There are still a lot of flaws before I can even consider it a wrestling show, to me it's still an'alternative'
|
|
|
|
Post by jasonsimmons on Apr 14, 2010 1:18:37 GMT
TNA is like Orlando Jordan's lifestyle...it's alternative
|
|
|
|
Post by Valdora on Apr 14, 2010 2:21:50 GMT
If alternative means making no sense then yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by DM on Apr 14, 2010 3:11:07 GMT
it's essentially an interview based 'kayfabe' 'oh my god if I can't win I don't know what I'll do' type of thing. The concept is....alright but don't we see enough of the backstage stuff as it is in 2 hours?
|
|
|
|
Post by alex0816 on Apr 14, 2010 3:43:17 GMT
its not really interveiws as much as it is behind the scenes, they keep kayfabe, but bring the realism to storylines with guys like angle,pope, aj,wolfe, and abyss
|
|
|
|
Post by DM on Apr 15, 2010 2:09:10 GMT
I don't mind the concept I think the big problem with it is they did stuff like that in the 80's, behind the scenes 'on scene' kind of stuff but if they're going to show that and then show impact where they 'character' is different the it kind of kills the point.
It's hard to really describe to be honest. I mean you have a solid idea like that and to follow up is...Impact, it's like having a great appitizer but a shitty dinner.
|
|
